Russian English
THE ONLY BLOG DOMAIN PROFIT-HUNTERS.BIZ! TOP, CC SITES AND OTHER - SCAMS!
PerfectMonet Epaycore Yandex Money Payeer Okpay Qiwi Payza BTC

Types of payouts in HYIPs - which mode of withdrawal of profit is better?

After making a deposit, any investor eagerly awaits the receipt of profit on his wallet. But each project has its own conditions for withdrawal, and for many investors this is one of the most important nuances that are paid attention to when choosing a hype. What methods of profit can be in the project, what is better for investors, admins and the security of the fund itself - we will understand this article.

Each project has its own characteristics, which directly depend on the imagination of the admin. As for the withdrawal of profit, everything is standard here and money can be sent to your wallet automatically without your participation, instantly upon request or manually.

Automatic payments immediately to the wallet

Investing in HYIPs is a passive income, the only thing that is required from an investor is to make a deposit and withdraw profit. With automatic payments, you don’t even need to do this, because the money will go straight to your wallet. That is why investors are so fond of automatic payments, because they do not even need to visit the site and create any applications - made a deposit and successfully forgot about the project. Unfortunately for many, automatic payments are very, very rare, and there are reasons for that.

The output automatically has a number of drawbacks, because of which admins do not like it very much. First of all, the project with automatic payments has very low attendance. Even if hype has a sufficient number of investors, they open the site at the time of registration and deposit creation, occasionally when news appears and, possibly, when the fund successfully goes into scam. There are no other reasons to enter the resource, you do not need to output anything from it, and because of this, traffic drops. This is reflected in the advertising of the fund, and the corresponding services (such as Alexa) this is recorded and spread panic among potential investors.

On the other hand, nothing is delayed at the box office of the project. Money is constantly sent to investors as payments and, because of this, the admin risks not matching the flow of deposits with its outflow, which will lead to the collapse of the entire scheme. If with other payments, especially with many hours of regulation, the board can hold some money and cover them with holes, then with a machine this system does not work.

Most pyramid builders, of course, do not talk about the above reasons when they explain why they have a handbrake and not an automatic machine. As a rule, they refer to security. Allegedly automatic payments are dangerous because attackers can withdraw all the money from the project. In fact, it is more a myth than reality. To understand this, it is enough to know how the movement of funds in the project occurs.

Firstly, there is no money right inside the project, they are on the admin wallet. Secondly, to transfer this money from the administrator’s wallet to the investor’s wallet API - A special software interface that allows hype to interact with the payment system. API It has its own security protocol and it’s just that you cannot hack it and steal money from the wallet from the admin.

There are any punctures and happen, it is only the fault of the admin. This is the sin of newcomers or krivoruky boards that keep all the money in one wallet, grab viruses through spam mailings and do not monitor security. In this case, it is entirely possible that the administrator will overwhelm the cash desk of the project, but not automatic payments will be to blame.  

When are automatic payments relevant? If we consider this issue from the side of administrators, then it is probably more convenient to work with a machine when the project has great popularity and a huge flow of investors. This simplifies the life of the admin and reduces the load on the site. But to solve these problems, an instant and a more powerful server are quite suitable. Therefore, speaking objectively, automatic payments are no more than an admin trick that allows you to make a project attractive to investors.

Instant or instantly on request

When the administrator does not want to carry the burden of manual payments, but does not want to lose traffic, instant payments come to the rescue. Their advantage is obvious - investors receive their money instantly, but for this they still have to go to the site and submit an application. This is the best option for both investors and admins.

By and large, instant payments do not differ much from automatic payments, except that the money comes to the balance in the project, and not immediately to the wallet. It is enough for the depositor to log into his account and press a couple of buttons, after which the money is successfully transferred to the wallet in the payment system.

The instant and the machine have a big minus - the slightest delay in payment can cause panic and lead to an outflow of investments. For example, the admin ran out of money in a wallet for withdrawal, and he did not manage to transfer it from the main wallet. Or there was a DDoS attack on the site and the resource is not working. If, with a manual conclusion, no one would even pay attention to it, then half an hour is enough for the negative to start and the project to receive the status of “scam”.

Manual withdrawal of funds

Most often, a manual conclusion is applied in projects, although this is the most undesirable option for investors. But whatever you say, but for HYIPs this is a great opportunity to keep money on hand and stay afloat when the flow of investments is sluggish. The peculiarity of the parking brake is that money from hype is withdrawn upon request and the project rules specify in advance the period that will be required for its processing.

Most often, this period is 24 hours, administrators sometimes go too far and establish crazy regulations that only repel investors. For example, who wants to wait for the receipt of money during 72 working hours? If you estimate that the working day is 8 hours, then such an application will be processed during 9 working days, that is, in fact the participant will also wait for the weekend. During this time, the project can be thrice chased three times or will take more than ten days to deposit and cover the shop without having made a single payment.

Some investors think that with manual payments the admin-hard worker checks all applications and confirms each of them separately. In practice, most often all this is done with one click and the board approves applications in batches several times a day. Therefore, most often the handbrake does not cause any inconvenience to administrators, they feel quite comfortable and have the ability to trick and process small applications faster than large ones. This approach also allows you to keep good amounts at the checkout and balance between the amounts of deposits and payments.

Which conclusion is better?

Each type of payment has its advantages and disadvantages, so it is definitely impossible to say which one is optimal. An automatic machine is better for investors, a handbrake for administrators. The truth, as always, is somewhere in between, so we can safely say that more often the instant becomes a compromise option. Nevertheless, in each specific case, one or another type of conclusion may be more appropriate and here it is already necessary to evaluate the project as a whole. If the fund is of high quality and with good prospects, then you can wait two days for the withdrawal, and if the fund is slag, then no automatic withdrawal will save.

It must be understood that the handbrake in fast can be the very foundation that will keep the fund afloat for a long time, and for some reputable funds, a long conclusion is also a continuation of the legend - after all, “the company works only on weekdays” and no one in it Fulfills applications at night and on weekends. All this confirms the long-known truth that the analysis of hype should be comprehensive and comprehensive, and the type of payment in it is not the last criterion that you should pay attention to.  

2 reviews for "Types of payments in HYIPs - which mode of withdrawing profit is better?"

  1. Avatar photo Labostamp:

    A useful reminder of the nature of investment pyramids

  2. Avatar photo Abalex all:

    Thank you for the article. I got the impression (from my short experience) that the Hype partisan is optimal, with regulations - a handbrake + 20-30 percent of the commission. Then the project serves for a long time (albeit without exorbitant profits).